Skepsis Insights

Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.

Showing the requirements whose account names OQ-36. Of the 5 shown, its answer released 5.

ID	Verdict	Basis	What that means
`XFER-17`	BUILD	research	All of it. OQ-36 names who does the legal work, and OQ-37 sets the sequence: Greece starts, and each further country joins only after a recorded legal sign-off for that country. A country flag per tumour board carries that state, and a country stays off until the sign-off exists. Still held. Nothing. The reason the sequence exists is worth keeping in sight: Article 9(4) lets each member state add its own conditions for health and genetic data, so national rules differ and one assessment does not cover the next country. Released by OQ-36, OQ-37.
`DATA-09`	BUILD	research	All of it that this product owns: the Article 14 register, the notice record per expert, the one-month due date the requirement itself states, and the send path. The external data protection officer owns the notice's legal substance and the legitimate-interest assessment behind it (OQ-36), which is an ownership answer rather than a gate on the machinery. Still held. Nothing. Sending to real experts waits on the officer's sign-off of the wording, which is a deployment precondition recorded in the register rather than a missing feature. Released by OQ-36.
`DATA-11`	BUILD	research	All of it that is this build's to hold: the assessment record, its version history and the link from each processing purpose to the assessment that covers it. Its substance, its balancing conclusion and its approval belong to the external data protection officer (OQ-36), who owns the legitimate-interest assessment for the Research Workspace signals in particular. Still held. Nothing. Released by OQ-36.
`DATA-12`	BUILD	inference	All of it, confirmed by OQ-36, which names the owner: the external data protection officer leads the data protection impact assessment, with lawyers engaged for specific opinions on the AI Act, the European Health Data Space Regulation and Greek law. This build holds the assessment record and the release gate that the assessment must be complete before real expert data is processed. Still held. Nothing. The assessment's content is the officer's work rather than this build's, and the gate in front of real data is what makes that ownership visible. Released by OQ-36.
`COMP-06`	BUILD	research	All of it that this build owns: the assessment record and the link from each processing purpose to it. OQ-36 names who carries out the legal work: an external data protection officer leads, with lawyers engaged for specific opinions on the AI Act, the European Health Data Space Regulation and Greek law. Still held. Nothing. The conclusion of an assessment is the officer's to write, which is an ownership answer rather than a gate on the machinery that holds it. Released by OQ-36.

Requirements