Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
FR-PROF-06 | DROPPED | research | Digital opinion leaders are out of scope for this product (OQ-21). No social-media tracking, no digital-opinion-leader view, no platform connector and no verification that an online voice is a clinician. This is a decision rather than a delay: a 2026 study found the most influential voices about one drug were mostly non-medical accounts, and a 2024 study found follower counts unreliable for finding opinion leaders. A caller reaching for this is told the product does not do it, not that an answer is pending. Dropped by OQ-21. The answer went the other way, so nothing here is waiting on anybody and nothing arrives later. |
FR-PLAN-06 | DROPPED | research | The requirement asked for adverse events to be detected in free-text insights. There is no free text to detect them in: insight capture is pick-lists only (OQ-24), and the fixed category list carries a safety item that opens the customer's own safety reporting page while this product stores no side-effect content (NP-08). The requirement is replaced rather than deferred, which is why a caller is told no instead of later. SEC-06 carries what remains of the obligation. Dropped by OQ-24. The answer went the other way, so nothing here is waiting on anybody and nothing arrives later. |
COMP-03 | DROPPED | research | The requirement was to show publicly disclosed industry payments. OQ-28 removes payment data from this product entirely, so there is nothing to show and nothing pending. The reasoning is on the record: US government guidance of 2020 warns against choosing paid speakers by past or expected sales, and a product that surfaced payment history beside a fit score would be building exactly that selection. NP-09 goes further in the same direction: no conflict-of-interest field, flag or note anywhere. Dropped by OQ-28. The answer went the other way, so nothing here is waiting on anybody and nothing arrives later. |