Skepsis Insights

Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.

Showing the requirements whose account names OQ-28. Of the 2 shown, its answer released 1, dropped 1.

ID	Verdict	Basis	What that means
`COMP-01`	BUILD	research	All of it, as a deny-by-default rule with nothing left to decide. No payment data, no claims data and no prescribing data enters this product, so US Open Payments, European payment registers, insurance claims and prescribing feeds are excluded from every profile, score and export (OQ-28). Still held. Nothing. The rule is easier to keep than it was to write: there is no ingestion path to guard, because none is built. Released by OQ-28.
`COMP-03`	DROPPED	research	The requirement was to show publicly disclosed industry payments. OQ-28 removes payment data from this product entirely, so there is nothing to show and nothing pending. The reasoning is on the record: US government guidance of 2020 warns against choosing paid speakers by past or expected sales, and a product that surfaced payment history beside a fit score would be building exactly that selection. NP-09 goes further in the same direction: no conflict-of-interest field, flag or note anywhere. Dropped by `OQ-28`. The answer went the other way, so nothing here is waiting on anybody and nothing arrives later.

Requirements