Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
Showing the requirements whose account names OQ-34. Of the 2 shown, its answer released 1, still holds part of 1.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
NEVER-05 | PARTIAL | stated | The forward-looking half, which does not depend on OQ-34: a mandatory current-consent check before any signal_event is created, so no signal exists for a clinician who never opted in and no NEW signal is created after a withdrawal. Basis is stated (clinicians opt in explicitly and can withdraw),... Still held. The retroactive half. OQ-34 has not decided whether signals a clinician already contributed must be deleted from Skepsis Insights or only excluded from new aggregations, so the withdrawal handler must not yet act on already-stored signals or already-delivered aggregates. Build the consent gate,... Still held by OQ-34. Nothing is defaulted in its place. |
DATA-06 | BUILD | stated | All of it, including the retroactive half that used to be held. A withdrawal deletes the contributor's stored signal events, recalculates every affected aggregate, and re-applies the suppression rules to every affected view, so a total that falls below 8 contributors or 3 institutions without them stops being shown (OQ-34). An expert may also withdraw entirely from the claim-your-profile page, which removes them from every list, card, trend and future processing, and the withdrawal is recorded with its time and the wording shown, because it is an objection under Article 21 (FD-03). Still held. Nothing. |