Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
Showing the 3 requirements that NP-02 released. A requirement that the document alone would have held is here because a decision with a date let it through.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
FR-PROF-01 | BUILD | inference | All of it, confirmed on 18/09/2026 and shaped by OQ-05 and OQ-18. A pharma user first meets an anonymous card: profession, country and topic, with no name, no employer and no question text. The profile proper opens only after the expert accepts a contact request, and then carries name, affiliation, specialty, the topic signal summary, the fit score, papers and trials. Optional fields appear when available: country, congress talks, guideline and society roles, grants, KOL type and last-updated dates. Every profile carries a completion score the customer can see, which sorts and scores nothing (OQ-18, NP-06). The expert may sign in with ORCID to fill the optional fields, see the topics flagged for them, and withdraw entirely (NP-06, FD-03). The 12 researchers of the August 2026 note appear nowhere (OQ-33). Still held. Nothing. Two rules travel with the profile: a withdrawal deletes the expert's stored signals, recalculates the affected totals and re-applies the minimums (OQ-34, FD-03), and tumour-board membership appears only inside a revealed profile, never on a card, an export or an API answer that precedes an acceptance (NP-02). |
X-13 | BUILD | inference | Tumour-board membership, which appears only inside the profile that opens after a clinician accepts a contact request, and never on a card, in a list, in an export or in an API answer that precedes an acceptance (OQ-46, NP-02). Still held. Nothing. Shown only above both minimums: 8 distinct contributing people (OQ-14) and 3 distinct institutions with the 5 percent dominance check (OQ-40, NP-12), with counts rounded to the nearest 5 and the differencing check refusing an export or API answer whose comparison could reveal a hidden count (NP-10). |
XFER-16 | BUILD | inference | All of it, confirmed by OQ-42 and OQ-46: a clinician is anonymous until they accept a specific contact request, the acceptance is stored with its time, wording and the company named, and tumour-board membership appears only inside the profile that acceptance opens (NP-02). Still held. Nothing. |