Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
Showing the 1 requirements that OQ-09 released. A requirement that the document alone would have held is here because a decision with a date let it through.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
FR-DISC-05 | BUILD | stated | All of it, as two halves the answer separates. Rules over public data suggest the type: a trial registry entry as principal investigator suggests trial investigator, a guideline, society or department-head role suggests clinical leader, and mainly laboratory papers suggest translational researcher. The customer's KOL lead then confirms or changes the suggestion, and the record holds who changed it and when (OQ-09). The suggestion is never the final word and the interface must not present it as one: the decision is the customer's, and the audit trail is what makes that true rather than claimed. Still held. Nothing. No per-type score cut-off is introduced, because the answer needs none: the rules are qualitative and the confirmation is a person's. Released by OQ-09. |