Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
Showing the 2 requirements that OQ-24 released. A requirement that the document alone would have held is here because a decision with a date let it through.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
FR-PLAN-04 | BUILD | research | All of it. Insights are captured through one fixed category list, the same for every customer: evidence gap, guideline or practice change, clinical-trial interest, safety question, access or reimbursement issue, and other (NP-08). There is no free-text box anywhere in insight capture (OQ-24), and an agency account keeps each client's notes inside that client's workspace (OQ-04). Still held. Nothing. The safety category opens the customer's own safety reporting page, whose link is held in their account settings, and no side-effect content is stored here (NP-08). That is the whole of this product's role in pharmacovigilance, deliberately. |
SEC-06 | BUILD | inference | All of it, confirmed by OQ-24 and NP-08, which also shrink it to almost nothing. Insight capture is pick-lists only, so no free text can carry a side-effect report into this product. The safety category opens the customer's own safety reporting page, whose link is held in their account settings, and no side-effect content is stored here. Still held. Nothing. What remains of the obligation is the routing link and the absence of free text, and both are cheap to keep because neither is a detector that can be wrong. |