Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
Showing the 1 requirements that NP-09 released. A requirement that the document alone would have held is here because a decision with a date let it through.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
FR-PROF-03 | BUILD | research | All of it. OQ-18 names the core set that is required: name, affiliation, specialty, topic signal summary, fit score, papers and trials. Everything else is optional and shown when available. The completion score is visible to the customer and to the expert, and no scoring or sorting rule may read it (NP-06): it exists to motivate an expert to fill their profile, and a completion score that moved rank would be a ranking of who filled in a form. Still held. Nothing. Two exclusions are permanent rather than pending: no conflict-of-interest field, flag or note anywhere (NP-09), and no payment, claims or prescribing data (OQ-28). A field fed by a paid source would need its own decision, a written licence and a visible source label (NP-05); none is licensed at launch. |