Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
Showing the 4 requirements that OQ-38 released. A requirement that the document alone would have held is here because a decision with a date let it through.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
NEVER-07 | BUILD | inference | All of it, confirmed by OQ-38: the clinician's own words never enter the signal layer. What is stored is coded labels and a machine-written summary built from those labels and the topic of the answer, generated inside the institution boundary, with the inputs to each summary logged (NP-04). Still held. Nothing. The log is what makes this checkable rather than promised: a summary whose inputs are recorded can be shown to contain nothing a clinician typed. |
XFER-03 | BUILD | stated | All of it. The consent screen can now say what it has to, because the answers fix what is recorded: coded labels plus a machine-written topic summary, never a clinician's typed words (OQ-38); no free-text question box exists at all (OQ-39); the ISO week and no timestamp (OQ-43); and a name reaching a pharma user only through the clinician's own acceptance of a contact request (OQ-05, OQ-42). Still held. Nothing. A consent screen is only as honest as the list behind it, which is why this requirement could not be built while any of those four answers was missing. |
XFER-06 | BUILD | inference | All of it, confirmed by OQ-38 and OQ-44: the signal carries coded items in the stated vocabularies, with the code list version recorded, plus a one-line machine summary written from the coded fields and the topic of the answer returned to the clinician, never from words a clinician typed (NP-04). The summary is generated inside the institution boundary and the inputs used for each one are logged. Still held. Nothing. |
DATA-05 | BUILD | stated | All of it. The signal layer records the scientific question and its field, and nothing else: coded items in stated vocabularies, a machine summary built only from those and the answer's topic, and an ISO week (OQ-38, OQ-43, OQ-44). OncoSkepsis has no free-text question box for patient detail to arrive in (OQ-39), and the identifier check runs over the structured fields before a signal is created (XFER-05). Still held. Nothing. This requirement used to be blocked by the absence of a stated content list, which is exactly what made it unenforceable: a prohibition with no inventory behind it is a sentence rather than a control. |