Loading workspace…
signed outSign in
Every requirement in bioskepsis-insights-user-requirements-v1.1.md, with the verdict the document’s own rules force. No requirement now carries the verdict BLOCKED. Each row carries both halves of its account, what is buildable and what is still held, and names the decisions that released it. A requirement answered the other way is DROPPED, and that is the one verdict nobody can go and change.
Showing the 7 requirements that OQ-44 released. A requirement that the document alone would have held is here because a decision with a date let it through.
| ID | Verdict | Basis | What that means |
|---|---|---|---|
FR-TREND-01 | BUILD | stated | All of it. Every input it needed is now stated. The accelerating designation reads the OQ-06 topic score rather than a raw question count, so 'asked more and more often' is a movement in that score. A trend is shown only when at least 8 different people stand behind it, and every displayed count is rounded to the nearest 5 (OQ-14). Time is the ISO week of a question and nothing finer (OQ-43). Topics are coded with OncoTree, HGNC, HGVS with ClinGen Allele Registry IDs, and ChEMBL, with the code list version stored on every signal (OQ-44). Research Workspace questions feed these aggregates and never a named expert (OQ-07). Still held. Nothing. Two bounds travel with it rather than holding it: the 8-person minimum and the rounding apply in every view, export, alert and API answer, not only on screen, and the differencing check of NP-10 refuses an export or an API answer whose comparison could reveal a count the minimum was meant to hide. |
X-01 | BUILD | inference | The cancer type named in a question, coded with OncoTree, whose code list version is stored on every signal (OQ-44). Still held. Nothing. Shown only above both minimums: 8 distinct contributing people (OQ-14) and 3 distinct institutions with the 5 percent dominance check (OQ-40, NP-12), with counts rounded to the nearest 5 and the differencing check refusing an export or API answer whose comparison could reveal a hidden count (NP-10). |
X-02 | BUILD | inference | The gene named in a question, as an HGNC symbol (OQ-44), confirmed on 18/09/2026. Still held. Nothing. Shown only above both minimums: 8 distinct contributing people (OQ-14) and 3 distinct institutions with the 5 percent dominance check (OQ-40, NP-12), with counts rounded to the nearest 5 and the differencing check refusing an export or API answer whose comparison could reveal a hidden count (NP-10). |
X-03 | BUILD | inference | The tumour variant named in a question, in HGVS notation with a ClinGen Allele Registry ID (OQ-44). A variant-level signal is shown only above both minimums and rolls up to the gene otherwise (OQ-41), which is the whole of the re-identification control here. Still held. Nothing. Shown only above both minimums: 8 distinct contributing people (OQ-14) and 3 distinct institutions with the 5 percent dominance check (OQ-40, NP-12), with counts rounded to the nearest 5 and the differencing check refusing an export or API answer whose comparison could reveal a hidden count (NP-10). |
X-04 | BUILD | inference | The drug, drug class or mechanism named in a question, coded with ChEMBL (OQ-44). ChEMBL is CC BY-SA 3.0, so anything derived from it that this product shares travels under the same licence. Still held. Nothing. Shown only above both minimums: 8 distinct contributing people (OQ-14) and 3 distinct institutions with the 5 percent dominance check (OQ-40, NP-12), with counts rounded to the nearest 5 and the differencing check refusing an export or API answer whose comparison could reveal a hidden count (NP-10). |
XFER-06 | BUILD | inference | All of it, confirmed by OQ-38 and OQ-44: the signal carries coded items in the stated vocabularies, with the code list version recorded, plus a one-line machine summary written from the coded fields and the topic of the answer returned to the clinician, never from words a clinician typed (NP-04). The summary is generated inside the institution boundary and the inputs used for each one are logged. Still held. Nothing. |
DATA-05 | BUILD | stated | All of it. The signal layer records the scientific question and its field, and nothing else: coded items in stated vocabularies, a machine summary built only from those and the answer's topic, and an ISO week (OQ-38, OQ-43, OQ-44). OncoSkepsis has no free-text question box for patient detail to arrive in (OQ-39), and the identifier check runs over the structured fields before a signal is created (XFER-05). Still held. Nothing. This requirement used to be blocked by the absence of a stated content list, which is exactly what made it unenforceable: a prohibition with no inventory behind it is a sentence rather than a control. |